My brain and body are absolutely exhausted with our wonderful newborn baby (born last week! Praise God! What a whirlwind haha). But it doesn’t mean I haven’t had random thoughts and ideas. However rather than post them on Facebook (which could lead to blowback, anger, and people getting offended, which I don’t have energy to deal with right now), I’m just going to post them here. They are pretty stream of consciousness and not necessarily related to one another, so take it all with a grain of salt đ
PARENTAL LEAVE. With one week of paid parental leave under my belt (I get a full month, Liz gets three–thank you InterVarsity!), I just want to say how incredibly ridiculous it is that the United States does not have any federally guaranteed paid parental leave for mothers (not to mention both parents). There are only 2 other countries on the entire planet besides the US that don’t offer any leave for mothers (Suriname and Papau New Guinea). Even comparatively poorer nations like Libya, Iran, Colombia, Ghana, and North Korea offer multiple weeks of leave! If we don’t want mothers to choose abortion, why isn’t our government doing something about this? It should have bipartisan support! And even Ivanka Trump supposedly was going to push for a plan for this. But of course Congressional Republicans seem to hate whenever government money goes to anyone that’s not a rich man or a corporation. And if Joe Biden becomes president, you can bet that they’ll automatically oppose any and every pro-family spending bill he puts forward for the sake of the “national debt”.
DIAPERS. I was honestly worried about changing diapers of a newborn, as it’s not something I ever witnessed or did growing up. But while it’s a little stinky, it’s honestly not that bad at all. Which reminds me of a fact I read about Donald Trump: on multiple occasions he has bragged that he never once changed a diaper, despite having 5 children–I guess his wives or servants always changed them??… To me I think that says a lot about who he is and his character. Unwilling to be a servant, not a team player with his wives, and a hefty dose of pride. He also thus embodies toxic masculinity instead of healthy masculinity (I could go on and on about that topic, but that’s for another day).
FREEDOM. In America, every citizen has the freedom/right to lie, commit adultery, be mean, curse people out, manipulate, be selfish, be greedy, hate others, take advantage of others, and generally do whatever we want. In certain cases (though not all) it is even legal to commit violence, kill, slander, and incite insurrection. Yet while an American has the right and freedom to do all of those things, in the Kingdom of God, Christians don’t have the right to do ANY them! Instead we are servants of Jesus, and only have the right to do the things he calls us to–which don’t include anything in that list. Thus it makes me sad when I see people who claim to be Christians get all up in arms about their “right” to do things like spread lies, share slander, or endorse violence. In an American sense, yes they have that right, but if they claim to be Christian then they ought not do any of those things, nor expect others to do so on their behalf.
KILL vs. DIE. A big difference between true Christians and most other people is this: most people are willing and eager to kill for the sake of their core values (protecting their personal property, expanding their empire, etc), but usually not to die for them. For a true Christian, it is (supposed to be) precisely the opposite. We are called to be willing to die for Jesus daily, but to never kill for him. Whenever you see Christians more passionate about killing and dominating others than they are about suffering and serving, be sure that you are probably not in the presence of the Kingdom of God.
ABORTION. This is a controversial topic, but I’m going to humbly put it forward. It’s a freaking baby. At the 12-week ultrasound our “Baby Yoda” was already kicking his feet, dancing around, and looking like a baby. It didn’t look like a fish or chicken or anything like that. Thus I’ve mentioned this in a previous blog, but I personally think certain progressive circles need to put a damper on the “abortion is wonderful!”-type rhetoric, which is admittedly rare but I have seen it. Anyone who’s had a birth, or God forbid a miscarriage, knows that there is something special about pregnancy and birth, and we should not be so flippant about that. Babies are not parasites invading a woman’s body; in fact there is something amazing and empowering about a woman who is able to carry a fetus to term and be a functioning, working adult at the same time (men can’t do that). NOW–that said, I think that abortion being legal, safe, and rare is the way to go, and that Democratic policies are actually the ones PROVEN to lead to a decrease in the abortion rate, while Republican policies are PROVEN to increase them (again, see blog). And of course there’s tons of gray areas like rape, incest, health of mother, etc. Thus my point is not about the actual policies, but about the rhetoric that is used. However since I’m not the person who actually has given birth or had an abortion, that’s all I’ll say on that topic for now.
QANON & POST-ELECTION VIOLENCE. Despite recent social media crackdowns, Qanon is once again gaining in support and traction in American society. There will be Qanon believing members of Congress elected this November (it’s inevitable), who will then be in a position to begin The Storm–the part of Qanon where Donald Trump declares martial law, executes all his political enemies, and begins a new rule where all Jews, elites, and liberals are crushed. If Qanon is false, it is spreading a horrific worldview to millions of Americans, most of whom own guns and are ready to kill anyone who stands in their way. And if Qanon is true, we are just weeks away from Donald Trump declaring himself Supreme Leader and ending American democracy. Either way, it’s something to be aware of. As a Christian who takes Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount both seriously and literally, I know I cannot intentionally take another life. But with Qanon out there (and related militia movements like the Oathkeepers, 3 Percenters, KKK, Proud Boys, and myriad others), it is a bit scary to contemplate what might go down after November 3rd. Last month at a Black Lives Matter demonstration a middle-aged white man slowly drove by my wife and me and pointed his fingers like a gun at each of us, and mimed pulling the trigger. Typical toxic masculinity posturing? Probably. But knowing that he definitely owns a gun at home is a bit scary. We saw a different guy drive by, a neighbor with a loud pickup truck who proudly owns guns and supports Donald Trump, angrily filming the demonstrators. Did he see that we were there? Is our house on the kill list for after the election? LOL we’ll find out!
Anyway, those are just a few random hot takes after not a whole lot of sleep! Please take it with a grain of salt; reach out if you have any questions.
Last week, I wrote an article on this blog that sought to explain why so many people are suddenly sharing posts about sex trafficking and pedophilia on social media platforms. In summary, one of the main reasons for this surge is that Qanon conspiracy theorists are seeking to bring more people into their cult by spreading innocent-seeming ideas and hashtags such as #save the children. (A lot of people found my piece helpful, and it reached ten thousand views within a few days â if you havenât read it yet, click here).
Within 30 minutes of sharing this article on Facebook, I received an angry public comment and series of private messages from a childhood acquaintance who Iâll call âBrett,â who I havenât spoken to in at least 15 years. As it turns out, Brett is a full time Qanon âresearcherâ who makes his living from Youtube videos, Patreon donations, and selling Qanon merchandise. While Brettâs initial Facebook messages to me were somewhat intense, demanding that I retract my âshitâ article, we ended up having a lengthy, mostly-polite discussion that lasted at least 8 hours of back and forth messages over the course of a few days. While itâs hard to summarize our entire conversation, which was both wide-ranging and involving highly technical Qanon terms and jargon, Iâll attempt to summarize a few key lessons that I learned below. [A few days ago, Brettâs Facebook account and associated Facebook group were suspended by Facebook as part of their crackdown on Qanon-promoting accounts. While I do not begrudge Facebookâs desire as a private company to crack down on the spread of harmful information on their platform, one side effect of this is that I am no longer able to access the messages he had sent me, and am forced to rely on memory. I have tried to reconstruct his point of view as fairly and accurately as possible.]
Arguing with a Qanon believer is like trying to hammer water
Growing up, I was enrolled in Christian apologetics courses, and later spent 8 years doing debate in high school and college. Suffice to say that I enjoy arguing back and forth on a variety of topics, so long as the person on the other side is willing to stick to their guns and actually argue back. For that reason, arguing with Brett was deeply, deeply frustrating. I asked a number of key, crucial questions about Qanon that are actually pretty straightforward, and rather than answer them, Brett would deflect to another topic or bring up an unrelated issue.
At the very outset of our conversation, Brett claimed that I should not judge Qanon on the basis of some of its followers, but rather judge it by its sourceâthe 4500+ âQ-dropsâ that serve as the holy scripture for Qanon. I was excited by that, because I had read a lot of these Q-drops and most of them are garbage: theyâre reposts of news articles, prophecies that are so vague so as to be applicable to anything, or are easy to disprove using basic logic. As I tried to get Brett to respond to each of these debunks of the Qanon holy text, he wasnât able to answer, and instead just would default to standard Qanon catchphrases like âdisinformation is necessaryâ, âdo your own research,â and âI canât explain it for you.â (But that was the whole reason I wanted to hear Brettâs point of view! He should be able to explain these things if he truly believes them, in much the same way that a paid Christian pastor should be able to address hard passages in the Bible.) For example, the very first Q posts stated as a bald fact that Hillary Clinton would be arrested âbetween 7:45 AM – 8:30 AM EST on Monday – the morning on Oct 30, 2017.â Of course that didnât happen, but when I asked Brett to explain the discrepancy, he simply said âthink for yourself.â Another Q-drop claims that North Korea is not being run by Kim Jong-Un; of course thereâs no evidence thatâs true. Other Q-drops are incredibly anti-Semitic; to those Brett had no response. For a complete breakdown of hundreds of Q-drops that are easily proven false, click here. Suffice to say that asking Brett to directly explain Q-drops was an exercise in futility.
In our discussion, I also asked Brett about the violent acts that Qanon followers have committed, from tearing families apart, to kidnapping children, to multiple murders, to attempts of assassinations and domestic terrorism. Brett claimed to me that Qanon is inherently peaceful and that followers âpolice their ownâ, such as arguing against the crazies in Qanon who believe that JFK Jr. is still alive despite his 1999 plan crash. (Interestingly enough, he himself at one point believed that JFK Jr. was alive!). But to any objective observer itâs impossible to ignore the violenceâverbal, physical, and ideologicalâ that is inherent in Qanon. Ultimately, Qanonâs denial of the violence in their movement is an application of the âNo True Scotsmanâ logical fallacy. No matter how many crazy acts of pain and violence Qâs followers inflict on others, Brett and others like him will simply say, âoh they werenât REAL Qanon followers.â Interestingly enough, Brett declined to denounce such acts of violence committed for the sake of his cause. I told him, âhey Iâm a Christian and I regularly denounce people in my religion who are in the wrong,â but for Brett it feels like that is not an option. Perhaps the ultimate reason for that is that Qanon is, at its heart, an inherently violent cult that longs for mass murders under the guise of âjusticeâ. Which brings me to my next major point.
Q keeps prophesying specific events, and they keep not happeningâŠbut that doesnât bother Qanon believers
One key issue I tried to pin Brett on was the timeline for all the prophecies that Q keeps predicting as part of Donald Trumpâs secret war against cannibals and pedophiles, but none of them have come true. Brett told me to expect a âcrescendoâ in the coming months, and I tried to ask him exactly what he means by that. (Most Qanon followers believe that any day now Obama, Hillary, and a host of other Americans will be jailed and executed in Guantanamo Bay for their supposed crimes.) Brett kept being vague about what this âcrescendoâ would look like. I asked him if hypothetically Donald Trump were to tomorrow declare martial law and start killing these Democrats for âtreasonâ, if that would make Brett happy, if that would be the long-awaited âStorm.â Brett flatly avoided that question, but a cursory look at his page shows that he longs for this type of violent, totalitarian justice to be wrought upon Democrats. âWe just want our country back,â he said in a recent post. To me thatâs the scariest part that Qanon has revealedâjust how many Americans are ready and indeed excited for mass killings of other Americans if theyâre opposed to Trump! Even now I routinely see people I know on Facebook talk about the âtreasonâ of liberals, for which the only just penalty is execution by the State.
Ultimately, given that Qanon started off with an easily provable lie (that Hillary was arrested in 2017), the only true believers who are still in the movement are those who want to believe in it. Any pro-Q âproofsâ and âevidenceâ that people like Brett produce to encourage the faithful are haphazard, misleading, or just flat-out wrong. However, those who have been leaders in the Qanon movement are often reluctant to leave it, becauseâŠ
Promoting Qanon can be a VERY lucrative business
In our messages, Brett told me that his full-time job is producing content for his Youtube channel and podcast, âWoke Societies.â I asked him to share the link, and spent a number of hours perusing his content across that platform and others, discovering that while Brett is not a top-tier Qanon promoter, he is managing to do quite well for himself. I crunched the numbers: Brett currently has 75 patrons on Patreon, with membership levels at $5, $15, and $25 a month. Thus Brett earns anywhere from $375-$1875 every month in (virtually) passive Patreon income. In addition, his merch store has 59 products of various Trump and Qanon branded mugs, stickers, and other items, which probably earns him another few hundred dollars a month. Most interestingly to me, Brett has over 100,000 subscribers to his Youtube channelâwhich he started only 16 months ago, and which has increased by nearly 70,000 subscribers in the past 90 days! According to a Youtube analyzer, with 100,000 subscribers Brett earns at roughly $101 per Youtube video through ads. In the past 30 days, Brett has published 15 Youtube videos, which has netted him a cool $1500. All told, at minimum Brett is probably making over $30,000 a year just by promoting Qanon theories and ideas. Clearly, this is more than a hobby, it is essentially a job.
When I asked him if perhaps his financial interest was blinding him to the truth about Qanon, Brett was defensive. Brett claimed that he only dipped his toes in Qanon initially as a hobby, but it wasnât until people started following him by the hundreds that he decided to make it his career. (To be honest, if I knew I had hundreds of thousands of people hanging on my every word, with hundreds joining by the day, I might decide to make a career of it too!) In this way Brettâs trajectory echoes that of Instagram influencers; the difference being that heâs not hawking a nail polish or makeup tutorial, heâs hawking an ideology that says Hollywood elites eat babies.
At this point, Qanon is inextricably linked to a vast number of other conspiracy theories
While I am often focused on debunking Qanon, since Iâve personally seen the damage it can cause, Brett would often demure and say that he actually doesnât talk much about Qanon on his podcast anymore, and that heâs just about âthe truth.â A quick glance at his Youtube channel and Tweets easily disproved that as a flat-out lie, as direct references to Qanon abound. But his reaction was interesting to me; it seems that Brettâs posts deliberately include a variety of other conspiracy theories in an attempt to reach a broader audience. A scan shows Brettâs Youtube channel includes conspiracy theories about a host of matters, including UFOs, Black Lives Matter, George Soros, COVID-19, a secret Nazi base underneath Antarctica, time travel, 9/11, manmade earthquakes, JFK Jr. still being alive, vaccines, al-Baghdadi being a CIA agent, the existence of astral planes, and Trumpâs supposed connection to Nichola Tesla, to name a few. As such, Qanon is sort of a âGrand Unifying Conspiracy Theory,â onto which emotionally and spiritually vulnerable people can link all their hopes, fears, and passions. While arguably some of these conspiracy theories arenât harmful and perhaps even a bit silly, many others of them have a verified death toll and are used to spread an authoritarian, anti-Semitic, and fascistic worldview. Thatâs dangerous, becauseâŠ
For many people, Qanon functions as a religious cult, and itâs very hard to leave once youâre in
I originally met Brett at a private Christian school, and so I asked him early in our conversation if heâs still a follower of Jesus. He said heâs not, that he hates all religions and all dogma. Perhaps for that exact reason, he took great offense to my claim that Qanon is a cult. He thinks that is derogatory and offensive (and perhaps there are other terms that might fit better). However, Qanon fits the bill for a lot of things that cult does. Qanon has: a set of holy scriptures (the Q-drops) which get interpreted by a number of prophets (Q researchers), a messiah figure (Donald Trump), a supernatural villain (the Jewish/Democratic/Hollywood cabal), an eschatology (the promise of mass arrests and executions happening, which then makes America great), a persecution complex (Twitter bans), a requirement of evangelism (exposing your friends and family to Qanon ideas via Facebook), and, in its linking to older conspiracy theories, Qanon also has a deep, complex story of good vs. evil that goes back centuries. Moreover, like religious cults, Qanon has the tendency of stealing people away from their families, drawing them to spend more and more time and money in an insular internet chat rooms while driving a wedge between them and their Deep State relatives who âjust donât get it.â In short Qanon fits the basic bill for a religious cult just like Scientology or similar cults do. Â
Like other cults, there are many paths into Qanon but it is very hard to get out of it. Some Qanon followers come in via dark, anti-Semitic & far-right corners of the internet. Others are loners who feel alienated from mainstream society, and are eager to embrace an ideology that gives them hope and a purpose. More recently, a surge of new members have been coming in from âwellness momsâ who are into New Age healing techniques, are anti-vaccines, and are passionate about protecting children from evil people âout there.â While these cultists co-exist somewhat uneasily, in Qanon all of them are unified in their hope of a Messiah, Donald J. Trump, who will liberate them from the evil Deep State overlords that are secretly running society.
The few hard-core Qanon believers who do leave the faith do so for one of a few reasons, all of them rare. The first reason is that these believers become frustrated at the slow pace of âThe Stormâ and are ready for the hammer to drop on Trumpâs enemies. These members are dangerous, as they may violently take matters into their own hands.
Another reason some people leave is that they have a âcome to Jesus momentâ where they realize just how many loved ones theyâve hurt and alienated by following Qanon, and decide to walk away from it all. However so far these people are rare, as the tendency to simply disappear deeper into the Qanon community is usually easier than rebuilding bridges one has burnt.
The last reason people might walk away from Qanon is that it ultimately becomes boring, and itâs more fun, meaningful, or profitable to simply move into a different religion. I honestly think that is what will happen to Brett within the next few months/years; he already has so many diverse interests, he may realize it is more profitable and enjoyable to monetize one of those with the skills he learned from Qanon. Perhaps most likely, he will move explicitly into politics, either as an online pundit or by running for federal office like the ~80 pro-Qanon Congressional candidates whoâve entered the race this cycle.
Why it matters
So in the end, does it really matter if a few million Americans believe in this conspiracy theory? Why not just leave them alone? Why take so many hours addressing this issue (after all, unlike Brett I don’t make any money from producing this content!)? The reason is that Qanon holds at its heart a dangerous, anti-Semitic, anti-democratic, fascistic worldview. While not every Qanon follower has these exact views, based on Brettâs videos and worries about George Soros, the Cabal, and the deep state, I have every reason to believe that he himself holds to many of the anti-Semitic conspiracy theories that have been around since the time of the Middle Ages and that were most prominent during the Nazis. Itâs uncertain to me that weâre about to enter a new era of bloodshed and violence, but regardless this ideology must be stopped.
In 1985, historian George L. Mosse wrote his ground-breaking analysis of European racism Toward the Final Solution. In his concluding chapter, Mosse warned that the same forces and ideologies that led to the Holocaust were still present in Western society. Read this quote below from that final chapter, but as you read, replace the word âracismâ with Qanon. Doesnât this sound exactly like our current situation?
âBehind all the attempts at justification [for the Holocaust] stood a fanatical belief in racist ideas. This was a racism which stemmed from the outer perimeter of the movement, connected with spiritualism, secret sciences, and cosmic battles. But such ideas came to dominate the mind of Adolf Hilter, who was at one and the same time a fanatic and a superb politicianâŠRacist myths not only explained the past and brought hope for the future, but through their emphasis on stereotypes rendered the abstract concreteâŠthis made racism a visually centered ideology. This stress on the visual [memes], in turn, made it easy for people to understand the thrust of the ideologyâŠracism was never at a loss for proofs which would make its stereotypes convincingâŠracism was a scavenger ideology which annexed the virtues, morals, and respectability of the age to its stereotypes and attributed them to the inherent qualities of a superior race. If racism annexed the virtues of the age, it also condemned as degenerate all that was opposed to such respectability.â
It might feel weird to spend 3000 words attacking such a bankrupt, scavenger ideology, one that seems foolish from top to bottom. But America in 2020 is a nation where bankrupt, foolish ideologies of white supremacy, fascism, militarism, nationalism, and others are making comebacks of their own. If we do not recognize the tell-tale signs of these ideological viruses, and do what we must to stop their spread, we will once more find ourselves surrounded on every side by politicians, church leaders, and family members who have been infected. Many of them already are.
[Note: I recently published this as an article for Franklin & Marshal College’s TrueBlue alumni network, accessible to anyone affiliated with F&M by clicking here.]
Making decisions about oneâs career and vocation is always challenging, and thatâs especially the case during this global pandemic, when much of the economy is on hold. Yet, as someone who works with college students and recent alumni in central Pennsylvania, I often see people get stuck in very narrow modes of thinking about their careers, ending up trapped in indecision or languishing in jobs that arenât a good fit. Iâll be sharing a few thoughts below, and while these are just a few of my personal reflections, hopefully there will be something that is helpful!
When I enrolled at Franklin & Marshall in fall 2008 as a double-major in History and Government, my plan after graduation was to go to law school and eventually become employed as a federal judge or politician. Suffice to say, none of that has gone according to plan. Instead, I worked as a middle school science teacher for two years in Baltimore, later married fellow alum Liz Albright Berg â12, and then began a career with InterVarsity Christian Fellowship in central Pennsylvania. (Most excitingly, Liz and I are expecting our first child, due in October!). But, compared to my original plans, my career trajectory is one that might be considered âdownward mobility.â My salary is lower than my parentsâ and most of my college-educated peers, and my job title less prestigious. I live in a small Pennsylvanian town (Carlisle) that most people have never heard of. Despite all that, my life satisfaction, values alignment, and overall happiness have never been higher.
However, to get to this place I have sometimes had to make decisions that go against typical American capitalist values. Typically, society usually tells young adults that there are only two worthwhile metrics for making career decisions: how much an opportunity pays, and how prestigious it is. Thus we jealously admire those who acquire six-figure consulting jobs or who are accepted into Harvard Law right out of college. But while those are certainly relevant factors for choosing a career path, they are not the only ones. Besides pay and prestige, here are some other criteria that I believe can be helpful in making a decision in where to live, work, or attend grad school after college:
Friends. Loneliness is an epidemic among young people. To fight that, some of my peers have intentionally chosen to live in places where their friends live, so that they have meaningful community and support close by. What if you prioritized living with a group of friends, and then looked for a job/grad program nearby?
Geography & Culture. Some of my East Coast friends have taken opportunities to move out to the West Coast, the Rockies, or even to other countries, simply to be in a different climate and culture. Consider choosing a path that allows you to experience a new place and environment.
Family. In the white American culture I grew up in, family obligations often took a backseat to individualsâ professional pursuits. But given the fragility of life exposed by the pandemic, perhaps itâs worth choosing to live in close proximity to parents, siblings, or other relatives so that one can enjoy time with them.
Passions and Values. Itâs often the case that our jobs donât line up with our deepest, most important values, and thatâs OK. Sometimes we just need something that pays the bills or is a stepping stone to another job. But that said, if an opportunity comes along to be paid to do something youâre passionate aboutâŠit might be the opportunity of a lifetime. For instance, I love helping young people grow on their spiritual journeys, so I jumped at the chance to work for InterVarsity even though it is less prestigious and pays less than some of the other options I was considering. Itâs possible there is a job out there for you that fits your exact passions and values.
Social Justice. Most young adults are passionate about fighting injustice, racism, and poverty, but arenât sure how to do so. Consider living in a place where you can have an impact in that realm. Is there an organization you admire that you can volunteer for in a certain city, like Black Lives Matter, Amnesty International, or the Sierra Club? But considerâit may be that you can have an even bigger impact in a small town or rural area. As my mentor (Jesse North) once asked me, âWhy does it feel like all the âwokeâ people who care about social justice end up moving to cities? Suburbs and rural areas need people who are passionate about social justice too!â Perhaps returning to your hometown and starting a new social justice initiative is the best way you can give back to the village that raised you.
Romance & Children. While itâs a bit counter-cultural in the college-educated demographic, whoâs to say you shouldnât get married and/or start raising children before youâre 25 or 30? While marriage isnât for everyone, if you find the right person that you can be partnered for an entire lifetime with, it may be worth committing to them instead of chasing a job that you might leave in a few years anyway. For me personally, I got married just before turning 24 and will become a dad this fall; this is younger than most of my F&M peers, but I have no regrets.
Growth Opportunities. Working for two years as a teacher in Baltimore city was an immensely challenging, difficult choice right after F&M. But I wouldnât have skipped that growing experience for anything. I grew in confidence, skills, and awareness of my own privilege and inner biases. What if instead of chasing a high-paying job, you looked for one to grow you in a certain skill or virtue? Consider checking out the Peace Corps, AmeriCorps, Habitat For Humanity, or other similar opportunities that stretch you in mind, body, and soul.
Faith Community. If you actively practice a certain faith or form of spirituality, itâs important to find a like-minded community where you can practice it alongside other people. (Note: digital faith communities are fine during coronavirus, but usually are not a good long-term substitute for actually meeting in person). Unfortunately, depending on where you want to move, it may be difficult to find a suitable community that meets your needs. So if youâre religious, consider: is there a faith community near where you want to live and work? Does that community reflect your perspectives on core questions of faith, or will you experience significant dissonance?
Cost of Living. Imagine two job offers: one job is located in Manhattan and pays $75k a year, and the same job pays $70k in upstate New York. All else being equal, you will most likely make a lot more money living in upstate NY simply due to lower cost of living. Consider also how smaller, cheaper cities like Baltimore or Pittsburgh might be a better choice compared to bigger cities.
Commuting Distance. Do you hate long commutes, or do you find they are an opportunity to read and listen to podcasts? Given how much most of us sit for our jobs, itâs worth considering if youâre willing to face a long commute or not.
At the end of the day, deciding what to do and where to live after graduation is complex, and there is usually not one ârightâ answer. I personally believe that there is usually a plethora of paths that a person can take, most of them just as good as the next. But it may be helpful to consider some of the criteria listed above when determining what is actually the best path forward, rather than reflexively going for the job that pays a few bucks more. Money is necessary for food and clothes (and Lord knows we need those), but life is so much more than that.
My earliest political memory is a discussion I had with Eggbert, the talking egg. For those of you without the privilege of growing up in New York’s lower Hudson Valley, Eggbert is a royal egg who comes out every holiday season to greet the children (and their parents) who visit Devitt’s Nursery and Supply. Through a camera and speaker cleverly hidden within his throne, Eggbert can talk to the children, ask what they want for Christmas, and even tell jokes. No Christmas tree is complete without an ornament of Eggbert hanging from one of the prominent branches, and now you can purchase cans of Angry Eggbert IPAs from the local Newburgh Brewing Co. Suffice to say, Eggbert is basically a celebrity.
So that’s why, in December of 1998, I proudly walked up to Eggbert and asked him, “Eggbert, what do you think of the ‘Clinton crisis?'” You see, while I had just turned 8, I was already interested in politics, and I had absorbed some of the key details of Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial. I didn’t know what sex was, but I definitely knew what lying was. Whether from my evangelical church, my Christian school, or my parents, it sounded like President Clinton’s actions were really, really bad, and I was transfixed by the idea that he might be removed from office.
I lament to say that I can’t remember Eggbert’s reply to my earnest question. But the moment stuck with me, and I’ve continued to be fascinated by politics ever since.
Evangelicals’ Rationale for Impeachment in 1998
From my perspective as an evangelical Christian looking back at the impeachment of Bill Clinton, there seemed to be two main issues conservative Christians had against him. By and large, they argued on the basis of morality, saying:
A President who told lies was not fit for leading the nation. As evangelical magazine Christianity Today wrote in 1998, “The President’s failure to tell the truthâeven when corneredârips at the fabric of the nation. This is not a private affair.”
A President who cheated on his wife showed a lack of character. Dr. James Dobson from Focus on the Family wrote: “Character DOES matter. You canât run a family, let alone a country, without it.”
Moral Hypocrisy?
In 1998, Bill Clinton apologized for his indiscretions, the Democrats swept the midterms, and the Senate voted along party lines not to remove him from office. While Republicans were upset, it seemed that they had proven themselves the party of integrity, of truth-telling, of morality, and of character.
Much has been written about the fact that now, just a few elections later, most of the same evangelicals who lambasted Clinton’s sins have rallied behind Donald Trump. Trump, of course, has violated all three of his marriage vows, lies frequently, and despite all that, has said he doesn’t ask God for forgiveness. Some evangelicals justify their strong support for Trump with claims that he has truly repented and changed, but to me it feels hard to see evidence of that. Instead, evangelical support looks like moral hypocrisy, a partisan shift of values to justify voting for a candidate they wanted in office. The data seems to back this up:
In 2011, only 30 percent of white evangelicals said that an “elected official who commits an immoral act in their personal life can still behave ethically and fulfill their duties in their public and professional life.” In 2016, that number skyrocketed to 72%.
Obviously, not all evangelicals strongly support Trump: âIf I were to support, much less endorse, Donald Trump for president,â conservative theologian Dr. Albert Mohler says, âI would actually have to go back and apologize to former President Bill Clinton.â Moreover, while the data indicates that White evangelicals remain staunchly in favor of the president, the support drops dramatically among evangelicals who are Black, Hispanic, or other ethnicities. Regardless, the level of evangelical support for Trump is striking.
How this feels different from 1998
One could argue that the charge of hypocrisy points both ways: In 1998 Democrats opposed impeachment while Republicans supported it, and now it’s the other way around. Neither party has been wholly consistent when it comes to concern for a president’s morality; partisanship is a two-way street.
The key difference I see, however, are the differences in the rationale for the impeachment. In 1998, the main crimes Bill Clinton were accused of involved sexual misconduct and lying under oath. Republicans argued that while these merely involved Clinton’s personal wrongdoing, such private actions disqualified him from public leadership. And maybe they were right.
But right now, Democrats are not impeaching Trump for his personal moral failings, egregious as they may be; they’re making the impeachment argument much bigger. For Democrats, impeaching Donald Trump is a matter of defending the Constitution, saving the 2020 election from cheating, keeping the Executive Branch from taking too much power, and preventing Russia from having malignant influence in American affairs. And unlike Bill Clinton who asked for forgiveness in 1998, Trump still claims his behavior is “perfect,” and seems willing to keep doing it.
In 1998, a significant number of Democrats crossed party lines to investigate and impeach Bill Clinton. There is virtually no chance that Republicans will do the same to Donald Trump today; indeed they seem unwilling to even allow witnesses to publicly testify. The increase in our country’s partisanship, driven by gerrymandering, social media algorithms, and straight-up bias, has unfortunately led us to a situation where a politician who dares to show an iota of character will be relentlessly criticized if they dare to go against their party line (Check out these replies to Republican Matt Gaetz when he voted with Democrats on a nonbinding War Powers resolution). Meanwhile, under Bush, Obama, and now Trump, the Executive Branch has consolidated more and more power, while Congress bickers over proper procedure.
I’m really not sure what the ultimate result of the current impeachment trial will be. It seems likely the Senate will acquit Trump, but it’s an open question as to whether the impeachment process will hurt his odds of reelection or not. Sadly, even if the full truth comes out during the Senate trial, it’s far less likely that people will believe it than in 1998: in our postmodern era, people are deeply entrenched into their political biases and automatically reject any evidence that goes against it. The most likely result is that, if acquitted, President Trump and his associates will be emboldened to continue using the office of the presidency for personal gain, and to continue lying to protect themselves. In 1998, Bill Clinton seemed chastened and publicly apologized, concluding his presidency without further scandal. I hope for the best, but I fear the opposite will happen with our current president.